| Title |
The motor basis for misophonia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Neuroscience, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1523/jneurosci.0261-21.2021 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sukhbinder Kumar, Pradeep Dheerendra, Mercede Erfanian, Ester Benzaquén, William Sedley, Phillip E. Gander, Meher Lad, Doris E. Bamiou, Timothy D. Griffiths |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 106 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 11% |
| United States | 11 | 10% |
| Mexico | 5 | 5% |
| Japan | 3 | 3% |
| Chile | 3 | 3% |
| Argentina | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 57 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 88 | 83% |
| Scientists | 9 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 37 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 17 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 40 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1607. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,003
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroscience
#4
of 24,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#342
of 460,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroscience
#1
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.