↓ Skip to main content

Journal of Neuroscience

Article Metrics

Comparative Brain Imaging Reveals Analogous and Divergent Patterns of Species and Face Sensitivity in Humans and Dogs

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroscience, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 22,841)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
86 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
twitter
75 tweeters
facebook
7 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Comparative Brain Imaging Reveals Analogous and Divergent Patterns of Species and Face Sensitivity in Humans and Dogs
Published in
Journal of Neuroscience, October 2020
DOI 10.1523/jneurosci.2800-19.2020
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nóra Bunford, Raúl Hernández-Pérez, Eszter Borbála Farkas, Laura V. Cuaya, Dóra Szabó, Ádám György Szabó, Márta Gácsi, Ádám Miklósi, Attila Andics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 75 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 22%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 12 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 22%
Psychology 11 17%
Neuroscience 8 13%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 21 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 771. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2022.
All research outputs
#18,941
of 21,911,552 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroscience
#17
of 22,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#857
of 332,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroscience
#2
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,911,552 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,841 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.